When Should You Do Usability Testing (and What Should You Test First)?

What to test first: the pages and journeys that move revenue

Usability testing is one of the fastest ways to improve a site without guessing. It shows you where real people get stuck, where they misunderstand what you meant, and where they quietly lose confidence. The reason it works so well is simple: analytics can tell you that people dropped off, but usability testing tells you why.

The mistake most teams make is testing too much at once. They try to evaluate the whole website gather a long list of issues, and then never fix half of them because it’s overwhelming. A better approach is to test the journeys that matter most, and only the pages that sit inside those journeys.

If you want a practical priority order, start here:

  1. Your highest-intent landing pages (paid campaigns, key SEO pages, partner traffic)
  2. Your homepage (if it’s a major entry point)
  3. Your conversion pages (contact, demo, quote, checkout, sign-up)
  4. The pages people use to build trust (case studies, pricing, about, FAQs)
  5. Search and navigation (if users rely on them to find products or answers)

That order works because it mirrors decision-making. People arrive, decide if they’re in the right place, look for reassurance, then act. If any step is unclear, the journey breaks.

It’s also worth testing at moments of change: before a redesign, after a big content shift, when conversion drops, when you add new products, or when you start spending serious money on paid traffic. In those moments, usability testing stops you solving the wrong problem.

How to run fast sessions without overthinking

Usability testing doesn’t need to be a research project. For most growth teams, the best format is lightweight, frequent, and focused. You want quick sessions that produce clear fixes.

A simple structure that works:

  • Give the person one realistic task
  • Ask them to talk out loud as they do it
  • Watch where they hesitate, misread, or get annoyed
  • Ask a few non-leading questions at the end
  • Repeat with a small handful of people

The key is not to lead them. If you explain the site, you remove the very friction you’re trying to find.

Recruitment is where people overcomplicate things. You don’t need a perfect panel. You need people who resemble your audience well enough to reveal friction. For B2B, that might mean a mix of roles. For ecommerce, it might mean a mix of device types and confidence levels.

Two useful ways to keep recruitment simple:

  • Ask your network or customers for quick sessions (in return for a small voucher or thank you)
  • Use a recruitment platform for speed, especially if you need a specific demographic

Most importantly, test on the device people actually use. Many journeys look fine on desktop and fall apart on mobile. And if your site is used in the field or on the move, include that reality in your sessions. “Fast” testing still needs to be realistic.

To keep sessions focused, aim for 20-30 minutes. One journey per session. Don’t try to test everything. You are looking for friction that affects decisions.

A person on a mobile phone running usability testing on an app

Turning findings into fixes: before/after improvements that stick

The value of usability testing comes from what happens next. The goal isn’t to create a lis of issues. It’s to create changes you can ship.

A useful way to translate findings into action is to classify them by the type of friction:

Clarity issues

People don’t understand what the page is for, what something means, or what happens next. This is often copy, hierarchy, labelling, and layout.

Confidence issues

People understand the flow, but hesitate because they don’t trust it. This is often proof, reassurance near CTAs, delivery/returns, pricing clarity, and form expectations.

Interaction issues

People try to do the right thing, but the interface doesn’t cooperate. This includes mobile touch targets, hidden buttons, confusing filters, error messages, and missing states.

Once you have the type, you can decide the fix. Most high-impact fixes are surprisingly small. Better labels. Once clearer CTA. A simplified form. A “what happens next” line near the button. A confirmation state that removes uncertainty. A re-ordered page that puts the answer before the detail.

To make changes stick, avoid vague tasks like “improve UX”. Instead, write fixes as clear outcomes:

  • “Users should be able to find pricing expectations in under 10 seconds.”
  • “Users should understand what happens after submitting the form.”
  • “Users should be able to filter products by size/compatibility without confusion.”

Then re-test the specific fix. That’s where the compounding gains come from: test, fix, re-test, repeat. Over time, you build a site that behaves the way users expect, which is what “good UX” usually means in practice.

If you want to show progress internally, capture simple before/after proof: a short clip of the issue, a screenshot of the fix, and a quick note of the impact. It’s the clearest way to build confidence without relying on opinions.

A final thought – usability testing is not about catching people out. It’s about catching friction before it costs you conversions. You don’t need a lab to do that. You just need a few focused sessions, the discipline to act on what you learn, and a habit of retesting improvements.


FAQ

How many users do you need for usability testing?

For quick, qualitative insights, a small number can reveal most major issues. Five to eight sessions on a single journey often surface the biggest friction points, especially if the audience is reasonably consistent.

What should you test on a homepage or product page?

On a homepage, test whether people understand who it’s for, what it offers, and what to do next. On product pages, test whether they can answer the key questions quickly (price, variants, delivery, trust, and what happens at checkout).

What is the difference between user testing and usability testing?

Usability testing focuses on how easily someone can complete tasks with a product or site. “User testing” is a broader term that can include concept testing, preference testing, interviews, and behavioral research beyond task completion.

Click here to get in touch or here to read more.


Visit our parent company, TAD electronics!

GET IN TOUCH